Following a three year investigation (!), EU officials have concluded that it is criminal to suggest that water can hydrate someone who is suffering dehydration. Yes, you read that correctly, but you might want to read that again to be sure you got it. Apparently, a meeting of 21 scientists in Italy concluded that "...reduced water content in the body was a symptom of dehydration and not something drinking water could subsequently control." So EU officials investigated and have now banned water bottle producers from claiming that water can rehydrate you. That's bad news if you're thirsty. Of course, it's also complete and utter nonsense. Now nonsense is one thing. But in these days, as the EU slowly collapses, it is particularly upsetting that officials - highly paid senior officials - are spending time and energy arguing the most basic and obvious facts of life instead of focusing on matters of importance.
As cool hand Luke would say, what we have here is failure to get the point. OK, that's my twist on what Newman's character would say. But you get my point.
On this side of the pond, the US Super-committee spent four months arguing about spending cuts before concluding that they couldn't come to any agreement at all. Really. Trillions of dollars in the hole and so blinded by selfishness you can't come to any kind of consensus on what to do about it. When I read that in today's headline, I understand that some of the most trusted and senior members of the most powerful country in the world haven't been able to apply what every kindergarten child learns in the first week of school (compromise is sometimes necessary). I guess they missed that point.
Meanwhile, here in my neck of the woods (Ontario), the throne speech of the new provincial government focused on massive new spending programs (all day kindergarten, cuts to tuition costs and building three new university campuses). Nothing against education, but I don't think more of what got us into this debt hole is suddenly going to get us out. Especially not if you start with 4 yr olds.
Any university graduate can tell you that Socrates said, "an unexamined life is not worth living". Shouldn't our leaders then examine what they are doing with their time and the resources we've entrusted them with? Failure to focus on the most important will inevitably lead to the tyranny of the unimportant.
And, if they won't focus on what's necessary and then to do what's necessary, shouldn't we be focused on replacing them? Unless of course we the people are so busy doing the unimportant; focused on building our own selfish little bubble empires that we fail to notice the very fabric of the country around us collapsing. What's that? We re-elected them HOW many times?
Talk about missing the point.
http://www.forbes.com/sites/beltway/2011/11/22/its-time-to-stop-squabbling-about-the-bush-tax-cuts/